1. Seira Kiani

    Final Blog Post (Final) The Pros and Cons of using Internet!

    by


    I will write about both the best and worst aspect of using internet. The internet is a global system of computer network to serve billions of users worldwide. It is a network of networks that consist of millions of private, public, business, academic and government networks that are linked by broad array of electronic, wireless and networking technologies. The internet carries huge range of information resources and services such as the inter-linked hypertext documents of the World Wide Web (WWW). Now a days people are using internet almost every day giving and getting a lot of information. Even the elementary schools are having computer classes and almost everyone has their own personal computer in their houses. There are a lot of good and bad aspects of using the internet which I will explain one by one.




    I will first talk about the good aspect. Internet is very useful for finding resources!
    Internet is used for writing papers, finding a lot of resources, and it is very good for research. There are almost everything in the internet so people do not go to library for their research papers like before. Before the internet came into our life, people used to go to library and read or search for something that they want and it took a lot of time to do such thing. It was very difficult thing to do and it was very time consuming. But these days people just have to type in something in the internet and there!!!! You will find almost anything! It is very useful and I don’t know what it would be without internet… it will be boring for SURE! I got used to using the internet so much that I can’t imagine without internet! It’s just too good for me! Hahahaha
    Here are some links (blogs) that it explain what is the good aspect of using the internet. 

    This explains how to get started with internet Marketing. How people can get into business with internet and how it is very positive! People can just stay at home with their PC and start a business without going out or wearing suits! No stress, just grab a cup of coffee and do your thing at HOME! 

    This one explains how it is a best aspect of using internet for keeping books online. It is very useful and people are using this system. It is very common and almost most business man knows about this system!



    Another best aspect of using internet from my point of view is that you can keep in touch with people all around the world very easily!
    There are a lot of things that we can do to update each other these days. Facebook, which almost all students have their own account and keep in touch with people, family members, relatives, and friends. I personally use Facebook everyday and I am very addicted to it! They will upload their pictures and we can see what they’re doing and make a comment on everything! I just love it! I feel more connected and close to a person and I think it is very good. Also we can make a lot of new friends on Facebook, all around of world! It is always good to make new friends ;) Most of the people are usi9ng smart phones which we could use Internet!!!!!! And FACEBOOK!!!! 



     
    Here are some blogs of the advantages of using Facebook.

    This one explains how Facebook is useful for checking evens. There are a lot of events and it is the easiest ways to find and get invited to the events and PARTY! ;) 

    This one explains how comments box in Facebook is good and useful. People who have Facebook account know exactly why it is good to have a comment box!


     Another advantage of using internet is email! We can use emails for everything. If we want to write for business letters, to keep in touch with people, also it is very useful to talk with our professors. This works both for private, business and professional way of keeping in touch with people. I always write emails to professors if I have questions and they will reply pretty fast and it always works good to ask questions.  




    Now I will talk about the disadvantages of using internet!
    First thing that pops into my mind is that, when we use internet for research it is not so reliable…As I mentioned earlier, internet is a very good thing to use for research and finding sources and information but at the same time, it is a little bit risky! Anyone can make their own blog or create website and write anything that they want and this could be dangerous because the information might not be true. They can write what they think and write a new theory for example. People who do not have a degree, even kids can write whatever because we can never find out what age is the writer and this is very dangerous. The essays can be a little weak if we rely just on internet sources. 



    Also Internet can be very addictive and people could be spending too much time on internet. Like I mentioned before I use Facebook almost all the time by my phone and I am one of the people who is addictive to internet. This is so bad because it might cause to lose my concentration on my studies and this is very bad… When I open Facebook and write a paper, I am both thinking about my paper and my Facebook, who commented on my status or my picture and so on… Also there are a lot of people who are using online games and they are constantly playing games and this is very bad… It is highly addictive and I don’t like to be one of them.


    Violation in privacy is another thing which can be cause by using internet. This could happen in Facebook too. If someone set their account not private, anyone in the world can see their profile and their wall also their personal information and pictures… This could be dangerous and people might get stalker in internet…!!! We just have to make sure and be careful about our setting when we create something, blog, website and new account! Here are some sites for disadvantages! 


    They both explains a lot of points of advantages and disadvantages of using internet! It is true...

    This site explains the disadvantages of using Facebook… Very true and scary!


    All and all I think internet is GREAT! But there are few things that we have to be careful when we use it, but if we know what will happen and what are the worst things that could happen, we should be fine. We cannot take out internet from our lives anymore because it is just too useful in any ways!



  2. Ikue Shimada

    Final -The Aspects of the Internet

    by

                  I think the best aspect of the Internet is that everyone could have chance to express and show his or her talent to others. The development of the internet created new pop culture, video sharing sites like YouTube. Such a video sharing site enables its users to show their talent to numerous audiences all over the world. YouTube has become the best place to dig up new comers. I introduced two artists in the former posting: Nick Pitera (link to his channel) and Two Chellos (link). Both of them had gotten the chance to be professional through their videos on YouTube. Not only amateurs but also professionals enjoy these social networking sites. In NicoNico Video many professional artists post their videos. For instance, Japanese traditional instrumental players such as Nami Kineie and Toshiya Mizukawa (both are Japanese sites.) voluntarily show their performance. They play a popular game song with the traditional instruments like a Japanese bamboo flute, samisen, and so on. (link to YouTube ver.)Their purpose is to make these instruments familiar to young people. This video made seven hundred thousand hits in the short period and attracted many young people on NicoNico Video. These examples show that video sharing sites provide many users of the places to flourish and broaden one’s world.




                  On the other hand, the Internet also has the worst aspect. Although social networking sites like Twitter are useful to get information and communicate with others, they could spread malicious thoughts of its users. Especially, Twitter has been called as “a fool detector” among Japanese Internet users because some stupid users tweet malicious words and even expose crimes that they had committed. According to “Gilbert Gottfried Fired Over Japan Jokes on Twitter,” a comedian Gilbert Gottfried was dismissed from Aflac because of making some jokes about 3.11 earthquake in Japan. Gottfried did a voice actor of Aflac duck. Although his offensive tweets had been deleted soon, they included these lines:

    • Japan called me. They said ‘maybe those jokes are a hit in the U.S., but over here, they’re all sinking.’”

    • “I was talking to my Japanese real estate agent. I said ‘is there a school in this area.’ She said ‘not now, but just wait.’”


    It is hard to understand his motives. Furthermore, a MR of Nippon Shinyaku Co. professed to mix Halcyon (a sleeping pill) into alcohol of her colleague on Twitter. (link to the article <Japanese>) After the company confirmed the fact, they apologized and announced that they would dispose of her rigidly. She had created her Twitter account with her real name and revealed company name that she belonged to. Her behavior destroyed not only her future but also the credibility of the company. I do not think that social networking sites themselves are not malicious. However, these offensive and criminal tweets would surely hurt one’s mind and dull a sense of crisis for crime. They also would effect on adolescent Internet users.



    The Internet has both positive and negative aspects. However, it is depending on individual users if these aspects have power on others. We should understand the nfluence of Internet and how to control it appropriately.
  3. Sakamoto

    malware and spying

    by
    Picture from this siteThings that seem to be very apparent today with the new age of the computers and the access that is not available to the internet, provides many people with the tools to look at politics and express what they want to say much more...
  4. Taichi Koido

    Final Exam Blog Post

    by
    For the Final Exam Blog, I will pick number 3 for responding.
    Here is my final blog of this semester!!

    Internet has been dramatically wide spreading in our society today. Everyone use Internet to communicate with people from all over the world, shopping, playing online games, downloading movies and songs, and having fun with Facebook or Twitter so-called Social Network Systems. Many of people say that the Internet is the best invention today. I think so too. The reason is that is because I can communicate with friends or people on SNS site such as Facebook. For example, the article “Facebook makes people more social”  states that “Facebook brings all our different networks and social scenes together. We present ourselves in different ways, whether to friends, co-workers, or family”. In fact most people have a trouble with enlarging social network, or making friends or communicating with people. However, the Internet especially SNS brings our social connection bigger. In addition, Japan has huge issue of communication among people. Japanese SNS solve the problem and enhance the chance to enlarge social connections. For example, the article “Mixi, Japan’s Biggest Social Network” from the web site says Mixi is the biggest social networking site in Japan, and it’s growing rapidly and has 4.8 million users. So that, after Japanese SNS, mixi introduced, Japanese people started to enlarge the social connection. I strongly think that the best aspect of the Internet is SNS and communicating with people and enlarging social connections.



    However, I assume that not many people realize the worst aspects of the Internet. Obviously Internet has a lot of advantage and best aspects, but there are many negative effects as well. I believe that the worst aspect of the internet is Malware and cyber-attack, which we covered a lot in our class. I have already mentioned in my old blog about I got Malware when I was staying at hotel in NYC. If it is just individual case, then it would not hart many people; however, if Malware attack companies or governments, then so many people will get negative impact. For example, the article “Industry body'scomputers used in cyber-attacks on Kawasaki Heavy” says that Japanese well-known company “Kawasaki heavy” almost get cyber-attack. In that case, Kawasaki Heavy could prevent the cyber-attack, but if they could not, then they will probably see the nightmare. In addition, my favorite SNS, Facebook also have possibilities to get malware. According to the website‘Facebook’ Malware Now Spreads Using BitTorrent, But Don’t Panic  says that Facebook have chance to get cyber-attack. According to this article, when someone try to connect and share with Facebook friends, then malware would attack. Therefore, malware and cyber-attack would be the worst aspects of the Internet I believe because it is violate people's privacy, and also devastate the individual computers.

    Therefore, I believe that the best aspect of the Internet is that it enable to communicate with people easily  and enlarge social connections, and the worst aspects of the Internet is Malware and Cyber-attack. So that we must realize that the Internet is very useful but it is also have huge negative impacts.

    Thank you very much for reading my final blog post.

    Have a great X'mas break!!


  5. Taichi Koido

    Final Exam Blog Post

    by
    For the Final Exam Blog, I will pick number 3 for responding.Here is my final blog of this semester!!Internet has been dramatically wide spreading in our society today. Everyone use Internet to communicate with people from all over the world, shopping,...
  6. avalostuj

    Final Blog Post.

    by
    Final blog post assignment:
    "Choose two or more articles from the four Scoop It channels. I’ve set up that are related to a similar issue. Compare and contrast the various articles and state your own opinion on the matter. Your must provide support for your opinion based on the articles from the Scoop It channels and other materials you have found that are related. You will be expected to provide links back to the supporting articles. You also will need to include at least two excerpted quotes from any of the supporting materials you choose."
     In my previous blog post for class, I blogged about Copyrights, and the inseparable Politics of cyberspace. In summary: Starting circa 20th century, an artist's work is subject to copyright as soon as that work is created. The phenomenon of the internet has forced democratic nations to rethink their constitutions of copyright laws. This is because media subject to copyrighting is so feasibly shared through the internet, via P2P networks and such. Thus record labels and big companies (big business) are loosing money, and policies like SOPA take effect. Now, the music industry is being revolutionized from the inside out, and the future the music business is coercing our fancy.
    (Note: The above applies to Western democratic values. For worldly view points of nations with different value, I urge you to read fellow blogger William Yeow's post)

    The Copyright

    Basically, internet mediums such as BitTorrent sites have driven the music industries to lose a lot of money. As Jukka Jouhki ponders in his blog post, Copy Right or Wrong - The Pirate Bay Case and Mind Games, it's a questions not only of copyright violations, but also one of ethics--what our society values as right or wrong. What Torrent sites like Piratebay.com do is merely link to links that link to other links with the actual copyrighted material, which is being uploaded by not one, but many servers. With such a perplexed concurrence, one must consider all the actors and moving parts, and ponder. Jukka wraps it up succinctly:
    Eventually copyright is a cultural phenomenon par excellence. It has always been an intriguing ethical issue and the digital age makes it even more so. It seems like the rapid progress of digital technologies makes it very hard for strict copyright to exist. Especially if the counter-sharing technologies and the law-making processes are not able to keep up with the development.

    Is it really right to go after these Torrent websites? Aren't they really just promoting the share of wealth amongst the world through the internet? To answer this question one must speculate where the artist stand and whether these big record labels are truly necessary.


    The Artist

    Jason Feinberg does a great job at speculating how the artist fall into copyrights laws in his blog post What's wrong with copyright? Where he expands on Brazilian musician Denis Borges Barbosa's critique of copyrighting music. He explains how the great composers and artists of the past had numerous master pieces, juxtaposed to the few that contemporary artist have in the last century:

    "Eighteenth century composer Georg Philipp Telemann...wrote some 8000 opi. There was no copyright law to protect his works. Likewise, Vivaldi composed over 500 concerti, 43 operas, published 100 opi. Handel staged 50 of his operas and 23 oratorios. Beethoven produced 849 opi (eight concerti and nine symphonies). Mozart and Bach were incredibly creative and prolific too...
    ...However, by the twentieth century, long after copyright laws had been laid down...Gershwin wrote a mere 19 classical pieces, 35 Broadway shows and contributed to 22 other plays, and seven films, while Bernstein wrote just three symphonies, two operas and five musicals"
     This copyrighting laws, in theory with Barbosa's speculation, has greatly limited our current artist potential. Knowing they will well copyright to sell their work as they please, they become successful and stop there. Humanity has been cheated out of possible masterpieces, all because of this limiting and restricting copyright laws that don't motivate current artists to toil away in their talent, doing what they love and are good at.

    The Record Labels

    So how much power does the artist actually have? Given the advent of the internet allowing the spread of media rapidly and efficiently, are the big music business really that important? According to Jason Feinberg,  president and founder of On Target Media Group, an online music industry and market, the music industry makes the most of it's money from the sales of the physical product. The internet has instantly taken that away, as the iTunes store sees more sales of mp3s than the actual CDs do.

    So why would a capable artist need a record label? Our current technological world allows the individual artist to sell and distribute his music all on his own. Heck, Dr. Dre and Snoop Dog have bragged about selling their tapes from the back of a truck back in '93. The information age world should certainly allow more feasibility than that.

    The only thing left of the companies and record labels to do is promote their artist. All artist need an experienced marketer to get their music out there, in the right places. Thanks to the internet and noble advancements, there can now be gargantuan amounts of music artist our on the net. As Feinberg points out:
    "Ultimately, labels will need to find new ways to generate revenue from their artist relationships, as the continuing decline in physical product sales will not sustain profitability."

    The Future




    But a smart artist and a smart manager can get past that need, if they market themselves accordingly. Erin Carrol's final presentation for the class was about Block fm and TYC Radio and and Recordings using social media to promote their artists. She seem on the roll with technology, and plans to manage and promotes her artist. As she showed us in class, she's already got "a family" of artist and marketers. With fresh young talent thinking out of the box like this, there isn't much home for big labels in the far future of music. Jukka ponders in the future:
    "Imagine the year 2050. Will we laugh at the ancient practice of having to pay for likeavirgin.mp3 as all possible public digital data is accessible free by anyone...?"
    If "outside-the-box" thinking from newer generations who chew up the internet protocols for breakfast can get past the necessity of  a useless middle man as the big record labels, then humanity will benefit greatly from art and freedom to enjoy it.
  7. Erin Carroll

    The British Royal Navy, The East India Trading Company and PIRATES!

    by
    PIRACY!

    (Unfortunately, this post is not about that kind of piracy. But that would be awesome.)
    (That being said, I know my blog title may seem off-topic, but stay with me here!)




    A couple of the larger torrent-file uploading sites, The Pirate Bay & ISOHUNT.

    Things are expensive nowadays and because of that, just about everyone toes the line and downloads something (or receives a downloaded copy of something from someone else) illegally. While not all file-sharing is illegal (for example, freeware or the Radiohead album In Rainbows ), generally things like Napster, BitTorrent & Kazaa, which provide an open peer-to-peer (P2P) system on which users can share music, movies, programs and more, are illegal. But to what extent are the private sector and the government involving themselves to stop illegal P2P file-sharing? 


    First, let's start off with the question, "What is P2P file-sharing?". 
    TechTerms.Com gives this brief description:
    In a P2P network, the "peers" are computer systems which are connected to each other via the Internet. Files can be shared directly between systems on the network without the need of a central server. In other words, each computer on a P2P network becomes a file server as well as a client.
     In one short sentence, two or more computers can connect to each other via the internet & share files. Oftentimes, these files are movies, music, television shows and other copyrighted material. While sharing these kinds of things may seem inconsequential (what with the burning of mix CDs, sharing of DVDs & books, etc...), since P2P file-sharing means that you haven't purchased the item in question, it has an adverse effect on the economy (and is technically considered stealing). Since this not only takes money away from the private sector, but also the government (in the form of taxes), it is something that they can both agree on & fight against, much to the displeasure of the internet pirates.

    According to an article on TorrentFreak, Google has begun censoring its autocomplete function to not include terms or websites related to torrenting (another term for P2P file-sharing):
    Initially only a handful of “piracy-related” terms were censored, but a recent update to the blacklist includes nearly all the top file-sharing websites.
    Searches referring to torrent sites such as “thepiratebay,” “the pirate bay,” “isohunt,” “torrentreactor,” “btjunkie,” “kickasstorrents,” “sumotorrent,” “btmon,” “extratorrent” and many others are now excluded from ‘Autocomplete‘ and ‘Instant‘. Interestingly, the full url “thepiratebay.org” is still offered as a suggestion.
    The new list further includes several cyberlocker websites that were perviously left unfiltered, such as “4shared,” “filesonic” and “fileserve.” ...
    It is suspected that Google did this in order:
    ...to keep on friendly terms with copyright holders. The downside to this is that they put perfectly legitimate companies such as BitTorrent Inc and RapidShare at a disadvantage. 
    Since BitTorrent can also be used to legally download files (several sites that BitTorrent links to offer "download" services for shows, movies, et al for a donation price), it does hurt them (and their affiliated sites) as a company.  However, Google's method and reasoning are not nearly as insane as that of the United States Government.

    This insanity brought about by the US Government is SOPA. SOPA, or the Stop Online Piracy Act, much like its creators, would work well if it were doing something else or didn't exist at all (No, I am not wild about the US Government. Or any government, for that matter.). A summary from The Atlantic states that:
    ...the Stop Online Piracy Act goes after piracy by targeting not just copyright violators, but entities on the Internet with which they might interact. And the way the law is written, these other entities will be effectively forced to censor content not after piracy has been proven, but when it is merely alleged. 'One infringing file or 'portion' (e.g. a forum thread) could be used as the basis to take down an entire website,' Devin Coldewey writes at the blog TechCrunch. 'That's a hell of a lever to have at your disposal, and the process for review is slow enough that it could easily be used as a perfectly legal kill switch for any site on the internet.'
    Imagine a world where making a harmless joke about downloading a file can get your blog, YouTube account or website taken from you. That is the world that SOPA will create. And SOPA is not just the by-product of a government that still carries a flip-phone:
    The Stop Online Piracy Act shows what happens when single-minded zeal originates not with bureaucrats or lawmakers, but with well-connected industry groups understandably focused on a narrow set of interests. They've been able to advance them not only due to the legalized bribery of modern lobbying, but for these reasons too: 1) The industry has a core grievance that is legitimate; 2) Congress is disproportionately made up of older people who are clueless about the Internet; and 3) this stuff is complicated, so neither journalists nor the general public have paid much attention to it.
    By comparison, SOPA makes Google's censorship look like a harmless prank- while both aim to please the corporate world, SOPA goes above and beyond the call, marrying the government with the corporate world in order to create an age where even mentioning "internet" and "piracy" in the same sentence could get you removed from the internet forever.

    These two articles show vastly different methods in achieving the same goal- an internet where people actually pay for things they listen to/watch/use. Google's method, a mere inconvenience to pirates searching for torrents, in this situation, seems like the more sensible way to go about things. You don't anger your constituents, alienate innocents and the uninvolved & eventually censor the internet to the point where it is no longer a useful tool. And while it has been said that:
    Congress, under pressure to take action against the theft of intellectual property, is considering misguided legislation that would strengthen China’s Great Firewall and even bring major features of it to America.
    America, a country that has always prided itself as being, "land of the free," seems to be taking a leaf or ten out of its largest creditor's (in October 2010, Mainland China owned 906.8 billion USD of US Treasury Securities ) book. However, in a country where everything from iPhones to Rolexes to DVDs are copied and sold on the black market:
    ...the United States...[is]... consistently critical of Beijing's failure to stop the illicit production of US brands...[and]...issued an annual report saying piracy in the Asian giant remained at 'unacceptably high levels'.
                     ...
    "In China, you can get enforcement but no deterrence," said Chow.
    "You can easily get a raid but there are no consequences to the counterfeiter, who usually pays a light fine and is back in business in two to three weeks."
    (Counterfeiting in China thrives: experts)
    It seems that the US is taking an opposite route when it comes to punishment for piracy, or even hinting at it. 

    While the government and Google did not drink the same Kool-Aid before brainstorming over what to do about internet piracy, they do seem to share the same objective of covering their asses. So for all you pillaging internet pirates out there, watch out, the East India Trading Company & the Royal Navy are out to get you!




    Articles/Resources (because I have a thing for MLA, sorry):

    Ernesto. "Google Now Censors The Pirate Bay, IsoHunt, 4Shared and More."TorrentFreak. TorrentFreak, 23 Nov. 2011. Web. <torrentfreak.com>.

    Friedersdorf, Conor. "Congress Weighs Fighting Internet Piracy Like the War on Drugs." The Atlantic. 18 Nov. 2011. Web. <http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/congress-weighs-fighting-internet-piracy-like-the-war-on-drugs/248690/>.

    Jackson, Allison. "Counterfeiting in China Thrives: Expers." Google. AFP, 2 Jan. 2010. Web. <http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jAzaA37JQGbYPUaKXJwts0nA8vXg>. 

    MacKinnon, Rebecca. "Stop the Great Firewall of America." Editorial. Nytimes.com. New York Times, 15 Nov. 2011. Web. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/opinion/firewall-law-could-infringe-on-free-speech.html?_r=4>.

    Monaghan, Angela. "Radiohead Challenges Labels with Free Album." The Telegraph. 02 Oct. 2007. Web. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/markets/2816893/Radiohead-challenges-labels-with-free-album.html>.

    "P2P (Peer To Peer) Definition." The Tech Terms Computer Dictionary. Web. <http://www.techterms.com/definition/p2p>.

    Rogers, Simon. "US Federal Deficit: How Much Does China Own of America's Debt? | News | Guardian.co.uk." Latest News, Sport and Comment from the Guardian | The Guardian. 18 Jan. 2011. Web. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2011/jan/18/us-federal-deficit-china-america-debt>.


  8. avalostuj

    Final Blog Post.

    by
    Final blog post assignment: "Choose two or more articles from the four Scoop It channels. I’ve set up that are related to a similar issue. Compare and contrast the various articles and state your own opinion on the matter. Your must provide suppor...
  9. Hirono Takigawa

    Final Exam; essay question

    by
    Write a blog post that focuses on separate examples of what you feel to be both the best and the worst aspects of the internet. You are welcome to use sources from the Scoop It channels or any other sources you find to be credible. You will be expect...
  10. Takeru Terajima

    Final exam post

    by
    So,,, unfortunately, this is the last time to post the blog for my CIS class.For the final exam, I chose the No 3 which is "Write a blog post that focuses on separate examples of what you feel to be both the best and the worst aspects of the internet."...
  11. Hirono Takigawa

    Final Exam; essay question

    by

    Write a blog post that focuses on separate examples of what you feel to be both the best and the worst aspects of the internet. You are welcome to use sources from the Scoop It channels or any other sources you find to be credible. You will be expected to provide two sources for both your best and worst example. If you use a source that is not available online, you will need to cite it at the bottom of your blog post in MLA format.




                  Because of the spread of the internet, all kinds of information could be known to everyone in the world immediately. In addition, the information is not just one way communication; it is possible to communicate among several people. The telecommunication technology succeeded to remove the borders between countries, and it also removed different social status or environment of every person. People using the internet have the same rights, and the information shared in the internet is basically treated equally valued.
                  It seems this virtual world succeeded creating the ideally equal world which is difficult or impossible to create in the real world. Certainly it is very important to be guaranteed that people can freely speech without limitation caused by their social status etc. However, the apparent equal opportunity also has possibility to bring unnecessary confusion in the information society.
                  When the internet began to spread, most people welcomed to use one without any concerns because it allowed us to send any information freely. However, that means, it is possible the unreliable or false information covers the web. Moreover, if so, there must be many people who cannot decide which information is reliable, and so the false information could be treated as the true information. No limitation causes confusion.
                  For example, people publish their sentences AFTER the publication company’s check which is to evaluate whether the article is valuable for the company to make money. If you can pass the evaluation check, you can publish your article. Because of this process, people can know the articles can be treated as reliable source, or useful for us.
                  However, if information without this process can be read or seen by anyone, it becomes hard to believe what is the true information, or which information is useful for us. In other words, we have to move in the confusion of too much information. We always face this problem when we write a paper about something and use internet sources.
                 This cite tells us 10 negative aspects of the internet! Check them!
                  However, I personally appreciate to the good aspect of the internet. As I mentioned below, the internet allows us to communicate beyond time and distance. That means it is easy to keep in touch with people I encountered. For example, the social network service such as facebook or mixi plays an important part in my life because I have many friends who are not in my country, or who are still in my home town (I moved to Tokyo 5 years ago). Some of them are pregnant or have little kids, so it is hard to go out many times for them.
  12. Takeru Terajima

    Final exam post

    by
    So,,, unfortunately, this is the last time to post the blog for my CIS class.For the final exam, I chose the No 3 which is "Write a blog post that focuses on separate examples of what you feel to be both the best and the worst aspects of the internet."...
  13. Rimi Morita

    The Light And the Shadow – For the Final Test Blogpost

    by
    So, for the assignment/test posting for a course, this one would be the last blogpost.

    Since this one's going to be an essay-like one, it's gonna be a little boring for some of you who are reading it... lol
    Well, pardon me about that, who aren't essentially relating to the course itself! XD;;;


    ***


    First of all, what are the best and the worst part of the Internet? Everyone who are using the Internet might have thought about that at least once.
    And the question itself seems simple, however, it is not that simple as long as the Internet itself has multiple aspects. Multiple aspects, such as information-source, individual speaking-out tool, networking system, etc.
    But anyway, Internet absolutely is a flood of information, and that is what makes the system both greatest and worst.
    Therefore, in this blogpost, it will focus on people who often are positively trifled by this flood of information; sexual minorities in Japan.

    Referred to sexual minorities, first of all, it has to point out what are the greatest goods for those people in the Internet.
    They are the points introduced below;
    1. Easiness for them to speak themselves out (Japanese blogs by LGBT people)
    2. Easiness for them to get information about people like themselves (Brief introductions about LGBT-related terms)
    Those goods are obviously attractive for them, because they oftentimes never have chances to speak out what they are, or to know what they are.

    About those goods however, they are not always the best, but cause some things almost the worst sometimes.
    Therefore, referred to the goods above, here, it will try to point out what the best and the worst aspects of the Internet are.


    Firstly, what is the best aspect of the Internet?

    That totally could be said that it is the frequency for people's communicating with information.
    Here is the example below;
    asking Google (Japanese Ver.) the question, "what is gay? (ゲイとは)" →
    As it could be seen in the link, there are about 19,300,000 results for the keyword, and in the top of it there are some answers which actually respond to the question itself; Wikipedia page for example.
    There, people can easily access to the general meaning of the term "ゲイ (gay)".

    Also, there is another way to access the answer for the question; there is Google Scholar if people want some deeper or academic information.
    There, it also offers about  3,760 links (since the put keyword is in Japanese those results are all in Japanese) which might be responding to the keyword, and many of the links which are available show articles those deeply refer to the question.


    Thus, it absolutely is clear that the Internet is highly useful for people who want to ask a certain question and collect answers for it.


    Focusing on the fact of the usefulness of the Internet however, people should not forget that the usefulness could cause a grave trap at the same time.
    Because of the massive amount of the information in the Internet, people might believe in wrong information without any doubts by accident --- accidents those can easily happen.
    Here is a blogpost that points out how sexualities are misunderstood by people.

    So, let it once shift its point of view to how people without certain sense of their own sexualities try to understand what they are.

    First, if the people had doubt about their own sexualities, they first try searching for tools for investigating themselves.
    In the Internet, they are able to find those sorts of tests really easily; such as the image below.
    Here, it says if the person who is looking at these cannot see what is written there in the circle No.5, he or she has high possibility of being a homosexual.
    People who are confident with what they are barely can believe this test, but people who are dying for anxiety can easily be wavered by it.
    And here is a similar-level ridiculous one, which was made as a joke.

    Same for the Internet viewed from mobile-phones, too; there are some mobile-phone FLASH applications for knowing one's own sexuality for extremely cheap.
    The provider of this application describes this test as something psychological and useful for solving minds; which never makes sense for many people.

    Of course, there are some useful analytical tests and articles for analyzing one's sexuality online, but they are not so easy to find one without a clear aim or a certain level of knowledge.
    (* In fact, when trying to find the link right above, it had to be found based on knowing the existence of the website in advance.)
    That way, many homosexuals mistake themselves as gender identity disorder, and also reverse accidents happen, too.

    Thus, it is obvious that the Internet can provide way too much information that can cause people to gain wrong knowledge.


    So, what can Internet users without calmness, confidence and knowledge do to protect themselves from incorrect answers to their question?
    What can they do in order to make good use of the goods of the Internet?

    Here is the answer for those questions;
    They only need to know that they have to be careful never to swallow the whole stories written online.

    They need to understand that they are not having knowledge enough to judge which information is the correct one, so that they will get to know what kind of questions they have to ask the Internet before getting to the answers they want.
    For example, in Japanese sexual-minorities' case, why not they first try to understand what all the referred terms mean before they start analyzing themselves?
    Or, they will simply get to wrong responses to their questions; what they really are.
  14. Fumika

    Final Exam #3

    by
         The Internet is a great tool to share information with people around the world. These days, people share a lot of things such as their music, art works and so on. Some people show their skills of cooking, make-up, exercise and a lot of other things, and you can learn those from their tutoring videos. A lot of people have become famous from YouTube and some other video sharing website. On the other hand, some people have had very bad incidents because of their videos even though they had not done anything wrong. Sharing your abilities and skills on the Internet could give you a great opportunity, yet also it could cause bad situation.
         There are many people who have had succeeded to build career on YouTube. An American girl, Michelle Phan is one of the successful people on YouTube.  She's an art student who has strong passion to make-up. She's been uploaded many make-up tutoring videos on YouTube. Since she has great ability, and a lot of people love her and subscribe her videos( Right now 1,688,664 people are subscribing her videos), a very popular cosmetic brand, LANCOM Paris offered her to collaborate. She also sells her own skin care cosmetics at iQQU Beauty.com.  She did a great job for this project. Isn't it a great success?


     
         There is another one who seems successful on YouTube. Her YouTube name is Binosusume(美のすすめ), the way of beauty. She does not talk about herself, she doesn't even show her face. She has a lot of hair-make up tutorial videos on her channel. Even though she speaks in only Japanese, a lot of non-Japanese people watch her videos too because so many people comment on her video in English.
    Now, 138858 people are subscribing her channel.




         Not only positive side but also there is negative side of the Internet. Rebecca Black's case is one of the big problems on the Internet. She was a normal girl who wants to be a singer, so she made a promotion video for her own song. It's posted on YouTube, then it became very famous in negative way. She have got a lot of negative comments on her song, Friday. Since it was very shocking, it became a big issue and ABC news companies interviewed her.  In the interview, she says she was shocked by those negative comments and crying. She became famous, but it's not the way she wanted. Right now she seems to start having positive opinion about what happened to her because that thing made her famous around the world. Yet still it was not something good or positive.



    Because I am Japanese, I guess I should also add something negative about on the Internet in Japan.
    There were some stupid college students who had a project as ドブスを守る会, "act for protecting very urgly girls". But they did not want to protect ugly girls, they just wanted to make funny video and magazines with those girls' picture. This was a kind of big news at the time. I am so sorry I could not find proper news article or English website which describes this situation, but I have a source here.  Those college students took some video of girls who are not good looking. They uploaded the video on YouTube (it's gone now) without permission of those girls . Also this news article says they wanted to take funny video with people who have disabilities on their bodies.They did not even hide the girls' faces! I found some videos that related to this thing. Because the person who uploaded this video wanted to protect the girls' the right to their portraits, it's covered with mosaic. After some people watched this video, they got angry and called their college, and the students got kicked out from their school, 首都大学. It was happened because of their lack of moral.


    ドブスを守る会 動画 【肖像権配慮バージョン()】 投稿者 Usawada


         While one girl becomes famous in positive way, one girl becomes famous in very negative way. The Internet could help you to success, but it also could cause you trouble. Before you post something on YouTube, you have to think of not only success but also the risk. When you post something on the Internet, you have to be aware that your post could cause something very shocking. Also you have to think of what is commenting could hurt someone badly. Posting something is easy, but you have to think of responsibility for it. Internet is no longer just a tool to share something positive. There are always many people who would do something negative. However, still the Internet gives you opportunity to show your skills and abilities. There are positive and negative side of the Internet, and you have to understand it if you want to use it.
  15. Fumika

    Final Exam #3

    by
         The Internet is a great tool to share information with people around the world. These days, people share a lot of things such as their music, art works and so on. Some people show their skills of cooking, make-up, exercise and a lot...
  16. Justin Rigsby

    Final Blog: It was the best of the internet, it was the worst of the internet.

    by
    bad.
    bad. by Nicholas James Santiago through CC Licensing
    THE BEST STORE IN TOWN

    THE BEST STORE IN TOWN by Robert Huffstetter through CC Licensing






       How do you define the best and the worst? After all, the best thing in the world is the worst thing in the world to someone else (i.e. how there are people on this planet who can actually somehow stomach the taste of pickles). A traitor to one country is a hero to another. So, I'd like to take a look at some things that have different perspectives, any incongruities involved and which side I think may have a better argument.

    FREE MEDIA

    This Is A Political Cartoon from Penny Arcade © Copyright 1998-2011 Penny Arcade, Inc.

      Copyright infringement has been a mess on the internet for well over a decade now. It flew under the radar for a while until Napster caught too much attention from the wrong people. It is true that the recording industries did lose a large amount of money since then, but many people believe that they were earning more than enough money as it was. CD copy protection, forced commercials on YouTube, legitimate pay to download sites (such as iTunes) and various things evolved to come up with ways around the lost revenue. Its easy to get caught up in the shock of what one has lost, but with a little ingenuity, things can recover. In light of what happened, there's been several lawsuits but are they really fair? Why are the penalties for song downloads MORE harsh than shoplifting the CD from a retailer? Consider the case of Jammie Thomas-Rasset from Minnesota. Why should she have to pay $1.9 million to make up for what would have only set her back $24 on iTunes? In fact, its been said that the musicians whose songs she is in trouble for downloading don't support the lawsuits against her and agree that paying the worth of the songs plus a court filing fee is more than enough. Now, consider what would have happened if she had shoplifted the physical CDs from a store instead. According to http://www.myminnesotadefenselawyer.com/ , if the value of the stolen goods is less than $500 it is only a misdemeanor. The punishments cap out at 90 days in jail or fines up to $1,000. Other sources say community service can be an option. Another response on Yahoo! Answers says he got off with only probation for shoplifting. That's a huge difference. This difference is caused by the gap in moderate laws created by law enforcement and greed induced lawsuits that happen when an industry gets to pretend that it is a policy agency. Why does this happen? The obvious answer we all get is that the people who have money have a huge influence on the people who make laws. Ironically, they seem to have a stronger hold over them than the people who actually voted to put them in office. If people start to refuse to vote for politicians that take money from lobbyists, the values in the government could drastically shift to the point where politicians actually represent the people they claim to. Another problem is that the internet is international. America in particular loves to go nuts creating these new laws for the internet but they don't seem to understand that their laws cannot be enforced on foreign sites. It seems that they're finally getting the idea, but the method to fighting it is a bit radical. In fact, it is exactly what China received international criticism for a couple years back. Wherever America makes a law, another country won't have one and I don't think that cutting the global internet into a domestic intranet is the right idea. Plus, where there's a will, there's a way and people will always find their loopholes or just break on through the old fashioned illegal way.

       On the flip side, what are the good points to free media? First of all, many believe certain artists would never would have been successful without it. Bands such as Linkin Park and The Mr. T Experience often have their success accredited to the fact that their early songs spread online creating a demand for their music. I don't believe that either band has made an official statement (which would be quite controversial) but I haven't seen any argument against downloading from either. Many bands have stepped up what the included content on their CDs is to make the albums seem more appealing than just downloading the songs. Behind the scenes DVDs, art booklets, and so on are a side-effect of the downloading phenomenon. I, for one, enjoy getting all the extra stuff when I purchase CDs now. Think back to the 80s and 90s. None of the VHS, cassette tapes, or early CDs I bought ever came with anything special. Hell, you were lucky if the cassettes even came with the words to the songs. Now, everything is all "special edition" and I actually feel like I do get a bit of my money's worth. The lead singer of Disturbed, David Draiman, made a comment in an interview with Metal Edge Magazine. He said,

    "...when KISS was putting out records, their 'Alive' record sold so well because it made you feel like you were part of the concert experience. There was also an actual program in the thing, all these pictures, the KISS Army stuff… There's so much stuff that added to the value of that package. There wasn't a KISS fan out there who didn't want the whole thing, because everything that came along with the music was so worthwhile to them. It's not rocket-science, this stuff." 

    Furthermore, it helped create a sense of international awareness of artistic expressions. Growing up in the US, we were effectively shut out from foreign music. If it wasn't in English, we didn't hear it. Part of this is due to American's negative attitude towards other languages, but it was always an uphill battle. Artists wanting to break into the US market almost always had to rewrite their songs in English which caused problems with timing the words and being forced to use the English language rules of rhyming lyrics that many other languages don't have. A few musicians slipped through the cracks but it was rarely more than once a decade. What ended up happening when Napster opened the doors is that an interest in foreign music skyrocketed. All of a sudden I was listening to bands I never would have had a chance to hear. Also, access to this music was crucial to me for studying Japanese. I even imported a handful of albums from musicians I learned to love. Some foreign groups also ended up getting domestic labels when their demand got high enough. Without downloading, none of them would ever have gotten their feet in the door.


     Free Anonymous Speech
    Free Speech for the Dumb
    Free Speech for the Dumb by Walt Jabsco through CC Licensing


      Back in the 90s we had guys like Howard Stern and Eminem. They were known for their shock value. Granted, there were several types of "tell it like it is" personalities over the years, but these are the big two I remember growing up. Once upon a time, it meant something to be able to speak your mind without fearing repercussions. In his song, The Real Slim Shady, Eminem acknowledges that part of his fame was built around the fact that he's "like a head trip to listen to, cause I'm only givin' you things you joke about with your friends inside your living room. The only difference is I got the balls to say it
    in front of y'all and I don't gotta be false or sugarcoated at all." Those were much different times. Granted, at that time LiveJournal was available, but not widely known. Forums were steadily growing and various messengers were popping up faster than we could sign up for them. What happened was that everyone could be their own little Slim Shady. We could say whatever we wanted and it would be attributed to a screen name. All of a sudden, repressed human nature exploded and it looked something like this:

    Green Blackboards (And Other Anomalies) from Penny Arcade © Copyright 1998-2011 Penny Arcade, Inc.

    The next thing you know, you're getting links to disgusting pictures taken at hospitals, porn, freaky porn, and whatever you can think of (or would have been better off never thinking of) in your chat window or e-mail inbox. All kinds of movements were made to stop this stuff from getting in to the hands of children (which didn't work due to the international nature of the internet and that merely asking what your birthday is won't stop a kid from entering a porn site [they're smart enough to lie about their age...at least I was back then]). It was getting so bad that I actually started to hate playing video games online because it was beyond irritating to hear some stupid kid shouting, screaming, and just using the most abusive and often randomly racist things I've heard right into the headset I'm using. Once Halo 2 launched, I reached a point where I decided to quit playing the game because I was spending more time blocking obnoxious people I had the misfortune of playing with than actually playing the game. Though while most people attribute anonymity of the speaker to the problem, the anonymity of the listener is also an attribute to this behavior. For example, I tend to hedge my words and clean up my language on facebook because I don't want my adorable 9 year old nephew to ask my sister what things like "chlasyphilgonnohrealherpanaidalwarted lice" are. If I didn't have my real name and real people I know on it, every 5 to 9 posts would probably either say "penis" or "vaginal discharge." Where I'm going with this is because Steven Q. Dangerfist is an alias, I am not inclined to hold back like I would on facebook or at a family reunion (on a side note someone actually did think my name was Steven Q. Dangerfist for real recently and I got a kick out of that) and I won't know the people who randomly stop by this blog and read it. If anyone is offended by it, their lack of identity would prevent me from feeling any regret over it.  Eventually, all of this miscreant behavior had to go somewhere, and that place is 4chan (the link is to the Wikipedia page on 4chan, not the actual board itself so its safe to click). 4chan has caught a lot of heat over the years for some very controversial content on its /b/ board that has almost no rules (just certain international crimes are not allowed as well as flooding posts). Although it is a controversial place, it is also interesting to see how it is self-policed. Every time someone goes too far, the members of the board have been very cooperative in ensuring that perpetrators are caught. The power to say and do whatever you want is great, but remember what good old Uncle Ben Parker has been reminding us of since the 1960's: "With great power comes great responsibility."

       On the flip-side, open communication has been hugely helpful. Many people are able to make new friends much easier than they used to be. More importantly, it has let those of us who were always treated as unnecessary by those around us have some sort of connection to others. In recent years, Japan has had this issue with people called hikikomori. In English, we have words like agoraphobia (though I guess that's more Greek than English...) and to some extent shut-in. Although it has been deemed a recent phenomenon, I think it has been around across most cultures and across all time. It's only become a public issue because these people suddenly have voices heard. When I read about what a hikikomori is, it hit me because it was exactly the way I was back in the 80s and 90s. One of the hardest things about being like that is this extreme sensation that you're the only one. With the dawn of open communication on the internet, it was like we all suddenly found out about each other. It's quite therapeutic. We didn't have to worry about being rejected anymore because it's a lot less terrifying when your name and face aren't involved. Over time, I wasn't pushing my bed or dresser against my door to keep the world out, I was sitting at my computer finally getting a chance to communicate with others. It was awkward at first and took a lot of practice, but by the time I got to high school I was actually involved in sports for crying out loud. Another thing that helped is that the line between being a geek and being a normal person got thinner and thinner and has even started fading out. As I slowly started feeling like a human, people also slowly started treating me like one.


    The Ending
       For anyone who took the time to read all of this, I hope you got something out of it. My lifelong campaign against tunnel vision by use of perspective doesn't end here. It just does for the sake of this class. There was a lot more I wanted to write, but I decided to cut it where it stands. Perhaps some day I'll do some upkeep posts on flip-side perspectives here to keep the ball rolling. I'll try to put more humor in the following posts...it's finals week...cut me some slack.
  17. Eric Edler

    The Good and The Bad

    by
    What are the best things about the internet? What are the worst things about the internet?It's impossible to pinpoint one thing because it is all a matter of perspective. Some people may say that the worst thing is social networks that steal your infor...
  18. Eric Edler

    The Good and The Bad

    by
    What are the best things about the internet? What are the worst things about the internet?It's impossible to pinpoint one thing because it is all a matter of perspective. Some people may say that the worst thing is social networks that steal your infor...
  19. mome

    One more post: Final exam questions

    by
    10 of the following 15 questions will be on the final. Here're what I think the answers are (if you know better, I'll trade my peanut butter and jelly sandwich for your..).What is the most common type of malware? TrojanWhen is a person's work subject t...
  20. mome

    One more post: Final exam questions

    by
    10 of the following 15 questions will be on the final. Here're what I think the answers are (if you know better, I'll trade my peanut butter and jelly sandwich for your..).What is the most common type of malware? TrojanWhen is a person's work subject t...
  21. mome

    One more post: Final exam questions

    by
    10 of the following 15 questions will be on the final. Here're what I think the answers are (if you know better, I'll trade my peanut butter and jelly sandwich for your..).What is the most common type of malware? TrojanWhen is a person's work subject t...

UMW Spring 2024 (Bond & Groom)

Welcome to Paul Bond and Jim Groom’s Spring 2024 ds106

Student Blogs

(9 posts)

[feedroll tag=”spring24bond”]

Spread some comment love! Find a random post from this section