Touch the firehose of ds106, the most recent flow of content from all of the blogs syndicated into ds106. As of right now, there have been 92391 posts brought in here going back to December 2010. If you want to be part of the flow, first learn more about ds106. Then, if you are truly ready and up to the task of creating web art, sign up and start doing it.

Response to the “Kind of Bloop” incident

Posted by

This is another fine example of a copyright holder making a martyr out of someone who probably makes substantially less in income than the former.  I haven’t been able to find anything out about their incomes, but I’m assuming that Maisel makes way more per year than Baio, seeing as he has a nice chunk of money in the form of a building in Manhattan that’s worth at LEAST $30 million.  Now, as far as fair use goes, I’m more familiar with the software/music side of that realm.  But I’ll take a stab at this…Be warned that I rage at the end :) I wonder if Baio gave credit to Maisel’s work, as he did with the songs.   By “gave credit”, I mean getting permission, citing correctly, etc.  It may be that it just didn’t cross his mind to do so.  And while settling was the wisest financial choice, despite his reasons, I think that this ordeal serves as a scare tactic to others who would try to do something like this an use fair use as a shield.  As Matthew Ingram explains here, “Fair use isn’t much good if you can’t afford it” (which just so happens to be the title of the blog post…Tee-hee :3).

But seriously.  It’s sad that in order to save your own ass with fair use, you need to have deep. REALLY DEEEEEEEEP pockets.  I mean, I’m all for asking the original creator to use something and giving credit where credit is due, and it seems that since the album was online-only, Baio could have just edited the cover or taken it down until he got permission to use it — I can’t be sure, I don’t know how those things work (is the album art a part of the download or something?).  But for cryin’ out loud…Why drag a man through the mud and spikes an thorns?  Yes, Maisel has a right to challenge Baio’s use of his work, but really…It seems like the Shrek/Stephen Spielberg example Thomas Hawk makes here.  It’s martyrdom, if you ask me.

I’m going to stop here before I go off on a tangent here.  But before I go, I just want to say something to the overly-wealthy people who drag smaller people through hell over stuff like this:  You pukes make me sick!  I’ll bet if you used a small-time artist’s work without giving them credit or getting their permission, and they called you out on it, you’d slam ‘em so ****ing hard with your over-priced lawyers that they’d shrivel up and blow away in the wind!  You little scumbags, I’ll bet Gunnery Sergeant Hartman would have a field day with you.  Now I’d pay $32,500 to see that.

Fair use isn’t much good if you can’t afford it

Add a comment

ds106 in[SPIRE]