1. @erinnmarieg

    Week 1 Reflection

    by
    Overall, I feel like I succeeded in completing the requirements of this week’s assignments. When I first looked over DS106, our syllabus, blog, etc. I was overwhelmed by the challenges facing me. I have never blogged before, never used twitter, and honestly had no desire to, but this class has forced me to rethink my … Continue reading "Week 1 Reflection"
  2. @Jennifer_Speaks

    Epic Proposal – Story Critique #1

    by
    For this critique, I used Jason Ohler’s assessment traits. I focused three traits: Story Project planning Originality, voice, creativity I evaluated the story and the writing of the story. How well did the story work? Is it is complete and understandable? I looked at the level of project planning. Is there evidence of solid planning – story maps, scripts, storyboards? Finally, I focused on…
  3. @jrpokrandt

    Week 1 – Reading Response

    by
    This week I read the following two articles: “Sampling ‘the New’ in New Literacies” – Lankshear & Knobel (2007) “7 Things You Should Know About Digital Storytelling” from the Journal titled “Educause Learning Initiative”   Sampling the “New” in New Literacies This chapter from Lankshear and Knobel’s book was a great introductory read for this class … Continue reading Week 1 – Reading Response
  4. @JARVIStech2017

    Week 1 Reflection

    by
    My week was rough.  Not the kind of rough that makes you want to pull your hair out.  The kind of rough that by the end of it you let out a long sigh and smile: “I did it.” Address the following questions: How well do you feel you completed the requirements of the week’s […]
  5. @darlesac

    “Man is not worried by real problems so much as by his imagined anxieties about real problems” ? Epictetus

    by
    So, this first week of Learning with Digital Stories is coming to a close.  I have set up numerous accounts, learned to use new tools, read interesting articles and websites, watched and listened to fascinating videos and podcasts, blogged and blogged and still have at least two assignments to complete today that I have started … Continue reading “Man is not worried by real problems so much as by his imagined anxieties about real problems” ― Epictetus
  6. @JARVIStech2017

    Story Critique

    by
    So, for whatever reason this assignment baffled me.  I just couldn’t seem to understand exactly what I was supposed to be doing.  I know this happens to my students sometimes, I can see their eyes glaze over and they begin to furrow their brow.  This was 100% me.  I just kept clicking around through all […]
  7. @innovateinmeta

    The Beginning of Infinity

    by
    “Dreams do not lack reality. They are real patterns of information.” Richard Doyle If you are looking to expand your paradigm, take some time to listen to Jason Silva. He paints luminous pictures with his words. He helps us get a glimpse into what is possible, what we strive for as humans, and how to […]
  8. @innovateinmeta

    Consensus Reality and Information Warfare

    by
    Review of Lankshear & Knoble’s “New Literacies Sampler: New literacies and digital epistemologies” (2007). Chapter 1. Summary The new ways of thinking are nothing short of epochal, say the authors of the book “A New Literacies Sampler“. A shift of paradigm into “post-industrial thinking” is slamming into the industrial mindset of the old guard, and the […]
  9. @edaviscalvert

    Week One Reflection: The Community Converges

    by
    As I complete Week One of ILT5340, one particular theme continues to emerge through the reading and participation in the various activities embedded throughout the course.  This is the idea of community.  While I have been steeped in research about digital storytelling and my own practice in this area has intuitively led me in this direction, the idea of situating learning and understanding within a community continues to repeat itself and I continue to be fascinated by how this happens and what creates the culture in which it happens with such fluidity in cyberspace.  When I first dabbled on the internet, it was 1993 or 1994.  I had young children at home and a newly found AOL account--very expensive dial-up.  I joined AOL specifically because it had a very active homeschool forum which was connecting homeschooling mothers together.  I quickly found a group and we started sharing information and learning about each other.  Twenty years later, I still enjoy close relationships with members of that group even though most of us are well past homeschooling our children who are now grown and have children of their own.  I quickly became literate in new technology which I now cannot imagine living without.  Though most of the people in this course will never know the unique sound of a modem connecting through a phone line and the expense of paying by the minute for a dial up internet connection!  


    C.S. Lewis wrote, "We read to know that we are not alone."  While reading is one piece of literacy, the key to his observation is the relational element of reading another's writing and responding to it in an interpersonal or intrapersonal way.  As the authors of Chapter 1 state, "Hence, there is no reading or writing in any meaningful sense of each term outside social practices" (p. 2).  We don't create an experience which is fundamentally social in isolation.  Instead, we create shared experience-or an experience which we hope will be shared.  While I am still attempting to understand Gee's definitions of discourses, which I am finding a little convoluted, it seems to me that the essential understanding of literacy is to be able to use multiple levels of many different types of literacy and to identify "literacies as social practices is necessarily to see them as involving socially recognized ways of doing things" (p.4).  This implies more than reading, comprehending, and writing--the traditional definitions of literacy.  It  implies an application which includes interacting and understanding relational activities. 


    As a secondary piece of research this week, I explored a chapter authored by Alan Davis and Daniel Weinshenker, “Digital Storytelling and Authoring Identiy.”  One of the themes of this particular chapter, in fact the stated purpose is to explore “how the processes of authoring these stories and their distribution to audiences become a resource in the authoring of identity and changing the relationship of author and audience” (p. 1).  The interesting elements of the Davis & Weinshenker explore are specifically around memory, creating identity and understanding ourselves through our own narratives and through the understanding of others.  Essentially, we solidify our identities when we tell our stories.  In my current research this extends not only to identify formation, but identity re-formation as when we work with students to understand themselves in different ways, we may be able to help them re-frame their stories  in more positives ways.  For example a student who has created a negative identify and who believes that he is a “loser” may be able to reframe that narrative and create an identity which allows him to understand that the situation of his earlier experiences make him a ‘survivor’ or even a “thriver” with the re-telling of the story. 


    The work this week has allowed me to dig a little more deeply into ideas of identity, belonging, community and how digital narratives can contribute to those far beyond more simplistic ideas of literacy.  For example, how literate are we if we can read, comprehend and express ourselves but have no ability to relate to what we read, comprehend or write to the discourse around us?  Again, I am still grappling with this idea of discourse and working my way through a better understanding of that—but it seems that this work is so highly relationship oriented and situated in a social context that literacy simply must be understood in an expanded dimension given the multiplicity of ways it is expressed across many mediums. 


    References


    Davis, A., & Weinshenker, D. (n.d.). Digital Storytelling and Authoring Identity. Constructing the Self in a Digital World, 47-74. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139027656.005

    Lankshear, C. (2007). Sampling the "new" in New Literacies. In M. Knoebel (Ed.), A New Literacies Sampler (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Peter Lang.



  10. @darlesac

    Everything Old Is New Again – Week 1 Response to Readings

    by
    The required reading for week one of Learning with Digital Stories was the first chapter of Knoble & Lankshear’s  The New Literacies Sampler.  I was at first surprised to find that we were reading a text that was 10 years old on a subject that seems a new phenomenon.  My second surprise was that this … Continue reading Everything Old Is New Again – Week 1 Response to Readings
  11. @CassieDunnam

    Reflective summary week 1

    by
    Reflection on this week of so many challenges. I have created two Daily Creates, a visual assignment, web annotation, and a digital story critique. This was all new to me and at times I wanted to drop out of the course. When trying to get everything done this week I felt overwhelmed and stressed that […]
  12. @AmyLGonzales1

    A Week of Firsts!

    by
    So many new things happened this week!  I had never heard of hypothes.is before, tweeted over one tweet in a week, really understood twitter #@, experienced ds106, blogged more than 3 times in a week (and tweeted about it), or had a class that functioned for the most part outside of Canvas.  Oh, I forgot […]
  13. @DCUCdenver

    Reading Response

    by
    http://www.digitalpedagogylab.com/hybridped/open-digital-pedagogy-critical-pedagogy/   OPEN DIGITAL PEDAGOGY = CRITICAL PEDAGOGY Written by Jody R. Rosen and Maura A. Smale   I often tell the students that I teach that I am by no means the holder of all knowledge, in fact I … Continue reading
  14. @lakaha77

    Week 1 Reflection

    by
    I am so glad to have week one under my belt!  I started the week STRESSED about this class.  I felt like there was no way I could succeed – I couldn’t even understand the syllabus.  But here we are – I made it!  I feel like I successfully completed this week’s assignments, as much […]
  15. @Alissagal8

    Week 1 Critique: Wanted – Eccentrics, experience preferred

    by
    I’m a great lover of eccentrics (I’m related to many of them) and so I chose Paul Wallis’s Sydney Media Jam’s blog in praise of eccentrics to critique this week. For my critique, I will focus on: Originality, Voice and Creativity, Flow, Organization and Pacing, and Story As I started to read the blog, I really… Continue reading Week 1 Critique: Wanted – Eccentrics, experience preferred
  16. @Alissagal8

    Interest-Driven Scholarship: “What is Web 2.0” by Tim O’Reilly

    by
    After reading a little bit about how Web 2.0 is driving the evolution of literacies in our reading of Lankshear & Knobel’s chapter “Sampling ‘the New’ in New Literacies” from A New Literacies Sampler (2007), I was curious to learn more about the technologies involved and how different they are from the technologies that emerged… Continue reading Interest-Driven Scholarship: “What is Web 2.0” by Tim O’Reilly

UMW Spring 2024 (Bond & Groom)

Welcome to Paul Bond and Jim Groom’s Spring 2024 ds106

Student Blogs

(9 posts)

[feedroll tag=”spring24bond”]

Spread some comment love! Find a random post from this section